Some people will not listen. I don't know how one would do it, besides–be incredibly enticing–they break–their own rituals, philosophy, attitudes, and living-style.

• March 6th, 2020, around 7' P.M. [to Chris Duff]:

You're super-imposing one idea of another. You don't trust the process of where I get my 'truths' from, so you refuse to look in the direction(s) they point, which means you'll never see that it works as a tool for discovery. You don't want to validate it, fine. I won't seek out any more of your posts, if so. I don't need to "defend" anything. If your ideas are superior, I have to forfeit mine, as part of the logical method. So far, they are not, because it is filtered through your intuition [and previous notions, conceptions, events, and experiences–that were not–flattened out thoroughly enough, to exact out all err'], which was exposed to what you call "silence" [in presence]. I don't deny you have some communion and wisdom*, just, a lack of reasonable articulation; which does justice, at least, to feelings–understandings–and such. You can also, be silent and observe, and think about what you've witnessed. Either which way, the moment always gets translated and reinterpreted through words, so the only thing next to do is become more precise in linguistics–so that–these ideas can clearly and accurately point towards truth, as much as feasible. You've chosen to not think about it, so fine. I object only to your unwillingness to be corrected, by the words you use, and not necessarily even, your interest in "silence".

• My rough definition [of wisdom]: healthful insight into the fabric of being / ancient, natural wealth in biologically, emotionally, mentally ameliorative practices. Of course the wilderness from that we came, is the ultimate source, for those disciplines, because it's what makes us what we are fundamentally–so–compared to alien, artificial symmetries, there is no better way to live optimally, according to the paradigms given to us by birth and evolutionary aeons of incremental, blind, and conscious selection.
• You don't have to be me. It's categorical, for ease of understanding laws and relationships, simply a way to draw a picture. The reality itself is whole. I don't need to separate anything–the process–merely points. Fear and insecurity could be a motivation, but they are not where the words are pointing to. So you refuse to look at that, and only, what you perceive to be the underlying mechanisms behind them. If you will not look at where these words are pointing, then I have no use in these posts, for the purpose of transferring illumination.
• Remain still, long enough, there will be no peace. Sure enough, the motivational forces will urge you to move, so that you do not die. So what is any more different, to move thoughts, so that you relieve emotional discomfort? It's not a requirement for survival, but it does what I want it to do, seek truth. So where do we draw the arbitrary line, and decide, what is 'worthy'?
• For reference to the comment thread [not everything written, here, was used, out of maintaining some self-respect–so I'm not going in circles, with myself, indefinitely–though, he does provoke plenty of dialogue out of me, I am pleased with; thank you for that, Chris]:
• https://www.facebook.com/chris.duff.98284/posts/2586878578254161