| main | ongoing | archive | private |
- You said in your speech that art had no boundaries, however we do know of countries that consistently impose boundaries to art. How do you imagine this imposition can be transposed?
- You said that "great artists have no country" and that we admire a lot of artists despite where they live or lived or even when. How does worldwide admiration can turn one into a country-less person?
- Duchamp says that "art is what the artist says that art is." Would you say that, taking this quote as true, we would be trapped into the idea and concept of art from another person?
- Previous knowledge might be required to the understanding of art. You mentioned Duchamp and his work can be included into this category. Would you consider that to be a boundary and, if so, how can it be transposed?
- Art can be defining of a nation's culture. Keeping that in mind, by saying that artists don't have a country, would you say that their work loses strength if they're only considered by a universal perspective?
- Taking into consideration that communication can be a barrier to the transmission of art, especially where to understand the content is imperative to understand the meaning of the work, how do you think artists can break this barrier without losing the essence of what they want to convey?
apr 2 2018 ∞
jun 22 2018 +
jun 22 2018 +