- university of chicago because of the one professor that professor rosenberg mentioned, and also the joint degree program
- university of michigan, ann arbor (are there multiple universities of michigans?) because their programs in history and anthropology individually rank highest and they are the first to have institutionalized a joint history and anthropology degree program and professor o'toole mentioned it 1, 2
- duke was the first one i found initially, but professor o'toole described the anthropology department as "weird" (or something like that). also i'm not sure if it's a joint degree program--the way it's described makes it seem more like a certificate (like REAP)!
- william & mary, bu, and brown all offer specializations in historical anthropology or the history of anthropology or history and anthropology or some form of that, but there's nothing formal about them. i also remember rejecting BU because its departments' interests were not exactly in line with my own.
- i don't think i'll ever actually go to university of arizona, because let's be real--it's the university of arizona, and while i'm sure its graduate program has no bearings to the stigma its undergraduate part does--i can't get rid of the connection i make between the school and some of the least intelligent people i knew attending it as undergrads (although to be fair, they could definitely be smarter than i gave them credit for--i am usually very bad at judging people correctly). but still, G O D their minor/concentration on anthropology of history and memory SOUNDS SO GOOOOOOOOD
jun 20 2012 ∞
aug 1 2012 +